The Rise of New Great Powers and International Law
The international legal landscape has witnessed unprecedented transformation with the emergence of New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century. This phenomenon, primarily exemplified by the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), is fundamentally reshaping how international law operates and evolves. The rise of these New Great Powers (NGPs) presents both extraordinary opportunities and significant challenges for the global legal order, creating a multipolar system that demands careful analysis and understanding.
Unlike the traditional dominance of Old Great Powers (OGPs) such as the G7 countries, these emerging powers bring distinctly different perspectives to international legal frameworks. The New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century dynamic represents a shift from Western-centric legal paradigms toward more inclusive, diverse approaches to global governance.
Table of Contents
Historical Context: From Unipolarity to Multipolarity
The transformation of international law in the modern era reflects the broader shift from Western hegemony to a more balanced global power structure. Since 2000, while extensive scholarship has examined how the United States’ supremacy affects international law, the impact of New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century has received insufficient attention.
This oversight is particularly significant given that NGPs represent over 40% of the world’s population and constitute increasingly important economic forces. China’s GDP surpassed Japan’s in 2010, making it the world’s second-largest economy, while projections suggest China could become the largest economic power by the mid-2020s. Such dramatic shifts necessitate a comprehensive understanding of how New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century interact.
BRICS as Catalysts for Legal Reform
Institutional Innovation and Challenge to Traditional Frameworks
The BRICS bloc has emerged as a formidable force advocating for comprehensive reform of international institutions. These nations consistently call for making international organizations “more inclusive, democratic and representative, including through greater participation of emerging markets and developing countries in international decision-making”. This commitment reflects how New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century prioritizes inclusivity over traditional power monopolies.
The establishment of alternative institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB) in 2014 exemplifies this transformative approach. With authorized lending capacity of $34 billion annually and starting capital of $50 billion, the NDB represents a direct challenge to Western-dominated financial institutions. By 2024, the bank had approved over $32 billion for 96 projects, demonstrating the practical impact of New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century initiatives.
Sovereignty and Non-Intervention Principles
Central to the NGPs’ approach is their emphasis on sovereignty and non-intervention principles. BRICS nations consistently oppose unilateral sanctions and unauthorized interventions, arguing that such measures violate international law and state sovereignty. This stance reflects how New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century prioritizes respect for national autonomy over interventionist policies.
The 2024 Kazan Declaration explicitly states that BRICS members “do not impose or support non-UN Security Council authorized sanctions that are contrary to international law”. This position demonstrates the collective commitment of these nations to reforming international legal practices through multilateral consensus rather than unilateral action.
Challenges and Opportunities in Legal Evolution
Fragmentation vs. Integration
One of the most significant challenges arising from New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century is the potential fragmentation of international legal systems. As NGPs develop alternative institutions and frameworks, there’s concern about creating parallel legal orders that could undermine universal international law.
However, this fragmentation occurs within existing international legal structures rather than outside them, suggesting adaptation rather than revolution. The rise of NGPs has prompted both Old and New Great Powers to engage in regionalism, particularly in trade law, but this represents evolution within established frameworks rather than complete departure.
It is interesting to know about thoughts of Grotius about India in the book The Law of Nations in Global History
Development and Democracy Deficits
New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century offers unique potential to address historical “development deficits” and “democracy deficits” in international law. Unlike previous reform movements like the New International Economic Order (NIEO) of the 1960s, current NGP-led initiatives benefit from substantial economic power and political influence.
The emergence of a “New NIEO” supported by NGPs could be less confrontational and more cooperative than its predecessor. This reflects how New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century can bridge developed and developing world interests more effectively than previous attempts at reform.
Technological and Economic Dimensions
Digital Transformation and Innovation
BRICS nations have prioritized digital transformation and innovation as key areas for collaboration. The 2024 summit emphasized cooperation in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and e-commerce, highlighting how New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century addresses contemporary technological challenges.
The bloc’s commitment to “fair and inclusive data governance” demonstrates recognition that future international law must adapt to digital realities while ensuring equitable participation in the global digital economy.
Trade and Financial Architecture
The financial architecture of BRICS, including the NDB and Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA), represents practical implementation of how New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century can create alternatives to traditional institutions. The CRA, established in 2015, provides $100 billion in contingency reserves to protect against global liquidity pressures.
This framework competes directly with the International Monetary Fund while offering developing countries alternatives with fewer conditionalities and greater respect for national sovereignty.
Future Implications and Trajectories
Expansion and Partnership Models
The recent expansion of BRICS to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates, with Indonesia joining in 2025, demonstrates the growing appeal of New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century approaches. The introduction of “BRICS Partner Country” status provides flexible mechanisms for Global South participation without full membership requirements.
Geopolitical Realignment
The concept of “geo-legal orders” is emerging, where interpretation and operation of international law increasingly depend on spheres of influence of leading states and political groupings. This fragmentation into multiple legal orders represents a fundamental shift in how New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century will operate.
Challenges and Criticisms
Despite significant achievements, New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century faces substantial challenges. Internal heterogeneity among BRICS members, different political systems, and competing national interests sometimes limit unified action. The diversity that provides strength in representation can also create coordination difficulties.
Additionally, established powers may resist reforms that challenge their traditional dominance, potentially leading to competing legal frameworks rather than integrated global systems.
Conclusion: Toward a Multipolar Legal Order
The emergence of New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century represents one of the most significant developments in international relations since World War II. These powers are not merely challenging existing systems but actively creating alternatives that reflect a more diverse, inclusive approach to global governance.
Success in this transformation will depend on the ability of both Old and New Great Powers to find common ground while respecting diverse perspectives on sovereignty, development, and international cooperation. The future of international law lies not in the dominance of any single power or group, but in the creation of genuinely multilateral, representative institutions that serve the interests of all nations.
As we advance through the 21st century, the impact of New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century will continue to shape how humanity addresses global challenges from climate change to economic inequality. The ultimate measure of success will be whether these emerging frameworks create a more just, stable, and prosperous world order for all.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What are New Great Powers in international law?
A: New Great Powers (NGPs) refer primarily to the BRICS nations – Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – which have emerged as significant economic and political forces challenging traditional Western dominance in international law and global governance.
Q: How do New Great Powers differ from traditional powers?
A: Unlike Old Great Powers (primarily G7 countries), New Great Powers generally represent non-Western states with different historical experiences, emphasize sovereignty and non-intervention principles, and advocate for more inclusive, multipolar international institutions.
Q: What institutions have New Great Powers created?
A: Key institutions include the New Development Bank (NDB), BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA), and various partnership frameworks. These provide alternatives to traditional Western-dominated institutions like the World Bank and IMF.
Q: What challenges do New Great Powers face in international law?
A: Main challenges include internal heterogeneity among member states, potential fragmentation of international legal systems, resistance from established powers, and the complexity of coordinating diverse political and economic systems.
Q: How might New Great Powers reshape international law?
A: They are promoting more inclusive decision-making processes, emphasizing sovereignty and non-intervention, creating alternative institutions, and advocating for reforms that better represent developing countries’ interests in global governance structures.
[…] This historical understanding has profound implications for contemporary international law, suggesting that truly universal legal principles must acknowledge the contributions and rights of all organized political communities, regardless of their cultural or religious background. The legacy of Grotius and India (from The Law of Nations in Global History) reminds us that international law at its best recognizes the inherent dignity and sovereignty of all peoples, providing a foundation for genuine equality in the global community of nations. meanwhile in 21st century New Great Powers and International Law emerged, Reshaping Global Governance […]
[…] In sum, “Mogul Sovereignty and the Law of Nations 1955 ” is not just a historical study—it is a vital resource for anyone interested in the evolution of international law, the dynamics of empire, and the ongoing quest for a just and inclusive world order.it is also important to dep down on New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century […]
[…] It exposes the performative nature of legal histories, where past narratives are mobilized to justify or resist current legal and political orders. Moreover, the pluralization of international legal histories, especially with the increasing prominence of Chinese and BRICS perspectives, challenges Western hegemonic narratives and invites fresh understandings of global order. Bridging the tensions between lawyers’ pragmatic use of history and historians’ empirical approaches is crucial for a nuanced appreciation of international law’s evolving role in a fractured and contested world. Read more about New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century: Reshaping Global Governance […]