Caste-based discrimination remains one of India’s most persistent social evils, deeply embedded in its history, culture, and even modern institutions. Despite constitutional guarantees and a robust legal framework, It becomes prompt to understand How Caste Inequalities Are Still Continuing in India and the challenge of how to stop caste-based discrimination in India continues to test the nation’s commitment to equality and justice. This blog, explores how to stop caste-based discrimination in India, examining recent judicial interventions, statutory provisions, and the path forward.

Table of Contents
Understanding the Legal Foundation Against Caste-Based Discrimination
To understand how to stop caste-based discrimination in India, one must begin with the Constitution. The framers explicitly outlawed untouchability under Article 17, declaring its practice in any form as a punishable offence. Articles 14 and 15 guarantee equality before the law and prohibit discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. Article 21, the right to life and personal liberty, has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the right to live with dignity, free from caste-based humiliation.

The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 (PCR Act) was enacted to enforce Article 17, criminalizing the practice of untouchability. Later, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (PoA Act) was introduced to provide stringent penalties for atrocities against SCs and STs, establish special courts, and ensure relief and rehabilitation for victims. These laws are central to any discussion on how to stop caste-based discrimination in India, but their effectiveness depends on both enforcement and societal change.
How to Stop Caste-Based Discrimination in India: Recent Judicial Interventions
The judiciary has played a proactive role in shaping the discourse on how to stop caste-based discrimination in India. A landmark development came in Sukanya Shantha v. Union of India (2024), where the Supreme Court declared caste-based discrimination within prisons unconstitutional, holding that such practices violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.
The Court found that prison manuals across several states still sanctioned segregation of barracks, division of manual labor, and differential treatment of prisoners based on caste and denotified tribe status. The judgment directed the Union and state governments to amend prison manuals within three months, remove caste columns from prisoner registers, and ensure that no work or segregation is assigned on the basis of caste.

The Court’s observations were profound:
“There cannot be any stigma attached to the existence, touch or presence of any person,” and “the right to live with dignity extends even to the incarcerated.”
The bench, led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, emphasized that the prison system must be considerate of the physical and mental health of prisoners and that oppressive colonial-era practices must be abolished. This case is a powerful example of how to stop caste-based discrimination in India through judicial activism and constitutional interpretation.
The Role of Statutory Law in Combating Caste-Based Discrimination
Enforcement of statutory law is essential in the broader strategy of how to stop caste-based discrimination in India. The PCR Act criminalizes the enforcement of disabilities arising out of untouchability, including denial of access to public spaces, shops, restaurants, and places of worship. The PoA Act goes further, defining “atrocity” and prescribing severe penalties for acts such as social boycott, humiliation, and violence against SCs and STs. The Act also mandates the creation of special courts for speedy trial and exclusive special courts in districts with a high incidence of caste-based crimes.

Despite these laws, the persistence of caste-based violence and discrimination highlights the need for stronger implementation. The Supreme Court, in various judgments, has repeatedly called for the sensitization of law enforcement agencies, timely investigation, and protection of victims and witnesses. In the context of how to stop caste-based discrimination in India, the law must not only exist on paper but must be actively enforced, with accountability at every stage.
Addressing Caste Discrimination in Educational Institutions
A critical battleground in the fight over how to stop caste-based discrimination in India is the education sector. The tragic suicides of Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi, both victims of relentless caste-based harassment in universities, brought national attention to the issue. In response, the Supreme Court, in January 2025, directed the University Grants Commission (UGC) to draft and notify robust anti-discrimination regulations for higher education institutions within six weeks. The Court stressed that these regulations must be more than symbolic, requiring universities to establish equal opportunity cells, monitor compliance, and ensure that students from marginalized communities have safe avenues for redressal.

The Supreme Court’s directive is a reminder that how to stop caste-based discrimination in India requires proactive, enforceable measures in every institution, especially those shaping the future of the country.
How to Stop Caste-Based Discrimination in India: The Need for Social and Administrative Reform
Legal and judicial interventions are necessary but not sufficient. A comprehensive approach to how to stop caste-based discrimination in India must address the underlying social and administrative factors that perpetuate bias. This includes:

- Sensitization and Training: Police, judiciary, teachers, and public officials must undergo regular training to recognize and challenge caste-based prejudices. The Supreme Court’s guidelines in Sukanya Shantha v. Union of India emphasize the duty of prison and police authorities to act without bias and uphold constitutional values.
- Data Collection and Monitoring: Accurate data on caste-based discrimination, violence, and exclusion is crucial. The absence of a comprehensive caste census since 1931 has hindered policy targeting. Judicial observations in recent cases have highlighted the need for regular inspection and reporting by bodies like the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) and Boards of Visitors in prisons.
- Administrative Accountability: Amendments to the Model Prison Manual, 2016, and the Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023, now mandate the prohibition of any form of caste-based discrimination in prisons and correctional institutions. These reforms must be monitored for compliance, with regular audits and strict penalties for violations.
Judicial Observations: The Evolving Constitutional Morality
The Indian judiciary has consistently underscored that how to stop caste-based discrimination in India is not just a matter of law, but of constitutional morality. In the 2024 prison discrimination case, the Supreme Court categorically rejected the “separate but equal” doctrine, stating that any classification based on caste, even under the guise of maintaining discipline, is unconstitutional unless it serves the limited purpose of promoting substantive equality and social justice. The Court found that vague criteria such as “habit,” “custom,” or “superior mode of living” are mere proxies for caste discrimination and cannot justify differential treatment.

The Court’s reasoning draws from a collective reading of Articles 14 and 21, interpreting the right to overcome caste prejudices as intrinsic to the right to life. This creative constitutional interpretation sets a precedent for future litigation on how to stop caste-based discrimination in India, expanding the scope of fundamental rights for marginalized communities.
How to Stop Caste-Based Discrimination in India: The Path Forward
To truly stop caste-based discrimination in India, a multi-layered strategy is required. First, the law must be enforced with zero tolerance for violations. This means swift investigation, prosecution, and punishment of offenders under the PCR Act and PoA Act, as well as regular monitoring of compliance in prisons, schools, and workplaces.

Second, institutions must adopt proactive measures. The Supreme Court’s recent orders to the UGC and prison authorities illustrate the need for clear, actionable guidelines, periodic reviews, and transparency in implementation. Universities and public offices should have functional grievance redressal mechanisms, and all allegations of caste-based discrimination must be taken seriously and addressed promptly.

Third, there must be a societal commitment to eradicating caste prejudice. Education and awareness campaigns, led by both government and civil society, are essential to change mindsets and foster respect for diversity. The judiciary has repeatedly observed that the right to live with dignity cannot be realized unless society as a whole rejects caste-based exclusion.
Fourth, data-driven policy is essential. A modern caste census, as advocated by legal experts and the judiciary, will provide the empirical foundation needed to identify gaps, allocate resources, and measure progress in the fight against caste-based discrimination.

How to stop caste-based discrimination in India is a question that tests the nation’s resolve to uphold its constitutional ideals. The law provides a strong foundation, and recent judicial interventions have shown that the courts are willing to act decisively. Yet, the challenge is as much social as it is legal. Only through a combination of strict enforcement, institutional reform, education, and societal change can India hope to end the scourge of caste-based discrimination. The journey is long, but the direction is clear: equality, dignity, and justice for all.